Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Actual. osteol ; 18(1): 29-39, 2022. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS, UNISALUD, BINACIS | ID: biblio-1395951

ABSTRACT

La osteoporosis es una enfermedad sistémica que deteriora la calidad del hueso y su arquitectura. Como consecuencia, predispone a fracturas por fragilidad, entre las cuales las fracturas vertebrales son frecuentes. Estas se asocian a una gran morbimortalidad. La vertebroplastia ha surgido en 1984 como alter-nativa terapéutica para tratar algunos tumores vertebrales y fracturas vertebrales osteoporóticas dolorosas. Este procedimiento consiste en la inyección de cemento guiado por imágenes, para estabilizar la vértebra fracturada y disminuir el dolor. La vertebroplastia puede ser realizada con anestesia local, sedación o anestesia general. La fuga de cemento fuera de la vértebra es una complicación común; sin embargo esto no suele tener traducción clínica y solamente se trata de un hallazgo imagenológico. En este artículo revisaremos las indicaciones, contraindicaciones, la eficacia, controversias y las complicaciones de la vertebroplastia percutánea. (AU)


Osteoporosis is a systemic disease characterized by bone quality deterioration. As a consequence of this deterioration, osteoporosis results in high fracture risk due to bone fragility. Fractures to the spine are common in this scenario, and relate to an increased morbi-mortality. Vertebroplasty emerged in 1984 as an alternative to treat painful vertebral tumors and osteoporotic vertebral fractures. This procedure relies on image guided cement injection to achieve pain relief and strengthen the vertebral body. Vertebroplasty can be performed under local anesthesia, mild sedation, or general anesthesia. Among its complications, cement leakage is common but it is rarely associated with any symptoms and it is usually an imaging finding. In this article, we will review indications and contraindications, effectiveness, controversies and complications related to percutaneous vertebroplasty. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Spinal Fractures/therapy , Vertebroplasty/methods , Osteoporotic Fractures/therapy , Chronic Pain/therapy , Administration, Cutaneous , Spinal Fractures/classification , Treatment Outcome , Vertebroplasty/adverse effects , Osteoporotic Fractures/classification
2.
Rev. Méd. Clín. Condes ; 31(5/6): 430-440, sept.-dic. 2020. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1224135

ABSTRACT

La fractura osteoporótica es una entidad clínica que afecta seriamente la calidad y expectativa de vida del paciente, agregándose un impacto socioeconómico elevado, superando incluso a los gastos de patologías como el infarto agudo de miocardio, accidente cerebrovascular y cáncer de mama, y cuya incidencia y prevalencia va en aumento a medida que la población mundial envejece. La gran mayoría de los casos cursan inadvertidos y sub diagnosticados, dejando a tres de cuatro pacientes, sin tratamiento y expuestos a nuevos eventos. El foco mundial en los países desarrollados como estrategia de enfrentamiento de esta patología endémica ha sido el de la prevención, vale decir medicina primaria. Sin embargo, una vez diagnosticada la fractura osteoporótica, no existe consenso en el tipo de tratamiento óptimo, así como sus plazos en estos pacientes. La mayoría de las guías internacionales y los trabajos publicados, presentan diferencias en el manejo de esta lesión.


The osteoporotic fracture is a clinical entity that seriously affects the quality and life expectancy of the patient, adding a high socioeconomic impact, even exceeding the expenses of pathologies such as acute myocardial stroke, vascular cerebral stroke and breast cancer, and whose incidence and prevalence is increasing as the world population ages. The vast majority of cases are non-diagnosed, leaving three of four patients with non treatment at all. The target in developed countries as a strategy to confront this endemic pathology has been prevention, or, primary medicine. However, once the osteoporotic fracture is diagnosed, there is no consensus on the type of optimal treatment, as well as its deadlines in these patients. The majority of international guidelines and published articles show differences in the management and treatment of this fracture.


Subject(s)
Humans , Aged , Spinal Fractures/diagnosis , Spinal Fractures/therapy , Osteoporotic Fractures/diagnosis , Osteoporotic Fractures/therapy , Spinal Fractures/classification , Osteoporotic Fractures/classification
3.
Rev. chil. endocrinol. diabetes ; 12(3): 165-169, jul. 2019. graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1006502

ABSTRACT

Existe escasa información respecto al estudio y manejo de la osteoporosis en los pacientes que han sufrido fractura por fragilidad en Chile. Objetivo: Describir la epidemiologia, aproximación diagnóstica y manejo realizado a pacientes hospitalizados por fractura por fragilidad (muñeca, cadera, columna) que ingresaron al Servicio de Traumatología (ST) del Hospital de Antofagasta (HRA). Método: Estudio retrospectivo, se revisó registros de pacientes hospitalizados en ST y se identificó a pacientes que presentaron fractura por fragilidad. Se revisó sus fichas clínicas (período enero 2015-diciembre 2016). Se analizaron factores de riesgos, exámenes realizados, terapias y controles médicos al alta. Resultados: Fueron 971 ingresos y 100 pacientes con fractura por fragilidad. 88% fueron mujeres cuya edad promedio fue 73,1 años. El factor de riesgo más común fue la postmenopausia y antecedente de fractura previa. Las fracturas se distribuyeron en cadera 64%, muñeca 35% y columna 1%. A solo 3 pacientes se le pidió densitometría ósea. En ninguno fue evaluada vitamina D ni PTH. Al 7% se indicó calcio y vitamina D post fractura, a 4% se indicó antiresortivos. En ningún paciente se promovió el consumo de lácteos. Discusión: Las fracturas osteoporóticas en el HRA son inadecuadamente estudiadas para descarte de factores modificables y son farmacológicamente subtratadas, con el riesgo de nueva aparición de fracturas por fragilidad y morbimortalidad asociada. Es importante reforzar en los servicios de traumatología la importancia del manejo médico postfracturas y eventualmente incorporar la participación de otros especialistas en el manejo de estos pacientes durante la hospitalización y al alta.


We have poor information regarding study and management of osteoporosis in patient who have a fragility fracture in Chile. Objetive: Describe epidemiology, diagnostic approach and management performed on patients hospitalized for fragility fracture in Traumatology Service(ST) of the Antofagasta Hospital(HRA). Method: Retrospective study, we reviewed your clinical record (period January 2015-December 2016). Risk factor, laboratory test performed, therapies and medical controls at discharge were analyzed. Resuls: 971 patient admited to ST, 100 were fragility fracture. 88% were women with average age 73,1 years old. The mosts commons risk factors were chronic kidney failure and anticonvulsants treatment. The fractures were 64% of hip, 35% wrist, and 1% column. Only 3 patients have bone densitometry. None had vitamin D or PTH evaluated. Calcium and vitamin D after fracture were indicated at 7%, antiresorptives were indicated at 4%. In none diary consumption were promoted. Discussion: Osteoporotic fractures in HRA are inadequately studied to rule out modifiable factors and they are pharmacologically subtracted, with risk of new fractures an mobility and mortality. Is important remember in the ST importance of the medical management postfracture and the multidisciplinary work.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Frail Elderly , Osteoporotic Fractures/therapy , Osteoporotic Fractures/epidemiology , Osteoporosis/complications , Trauma Centers , Chile/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Osteoporotic Fractures/diagnosis , Hospitalization
4.
Actual. osteol ; 15(1): 44-56, ene. abr. 2019. tab.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1049134

ABSTRACT

Los pacientes con fracturas por fragilidad presentan elevadas tasas de morbimortalidad, lo que implica además un alto costo para el erario público. Luego de una fractura por osteoporosis, la mayoría de los pacientes no recibe una adecuada evaluación y tratamiento. Para suplir este vacío de atención médica se crearon distintas políticas; la mejor de ellas son los Servicios de Enlace de Pacientes con Fracturas (Fracture Liaison Service, en inglés). Estos programas tienen una vigencia internacional de más de diez años y son patrocinados por organismos internacionales. La finalidad de estos servicios es la prevención secundaria de fracturas. La modalidad de trabajo tiene como objetivo facilitar y asegurar la rápida identificación, el diagnóstico y la terapéutica de esta población en diferentes contextos asistenciales. La experiencia internacional demuestra que estos servicios son exitosos pues logran incrementar el inicio y la adherencia al tratamiento, disminuir las tasas de mortalidad, de morbilidad y de nuevas fracturas, y son costo-efectivos. En nuestro medio, el inicio de los Servicios de Enlace es reciente. El propósito de esta actualización es realizar una revisión de los fundamentos, características, modalidad operativa y los logros obtenidos por dichos programas. Las fracturas por fragilidad ósea constituyen un problema importante para la salud pública. Esta presentación tiene como objetivo alertar y motivar a la comunidad médica a intervenir de manera sistemática y dinámica para mejorar el cuidado habitual en esta población de pacientes. (AU)


Fragility fractures are associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates and higher costs. After a fracture, most patients do not receive adequate assessment and treatment. To fill this gap in medical care, different policies have been created; the best of them being the Fracture Liaison Services. These programs have been in place for over ten years worldwide and are sponsored by international organisms and societies. The purpose of the Fracture Liaison Services is secondary fracture prevention. Their goal is to ensure the rapid identification, diagnosis and treatment of this population in different clinical contexts. They increase treatment adherence and decrease mortality and morbidity rates and the incidence of new fractures. International experience shows that these services are successful and costeffective. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Osteoporotic Fractures/prevention & control , Osteoporotic Fractures/therapy , Osteoporosis , Public Health/statistics & numerical data , Osteoporotic Fractures/mortality , Osteoporotic Fractures/epidemiology , Patient Comfort , Treatment Adherence and Compliance
6.
Acta cir. bras ; 30(11): 727-735, Nov. 2015. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-767596

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of vibration therapy on the bone callus of fractured femurs and the bone quality of intact femurs in ovariectomized rats. METHODS: Fifty-six rats aged seven weeks were divided into four groups: control with femoral fracture (CON, n=14), ovariectomized with femoral fracture (OVX, n=14), control with femoral fracture plus vibration therapy (CON+VT, n=14), and ovariectomized with femoral fracture plus vibration therapy (OVX+VT, n=14). Three months after ovariectomy or sham surgery, a complete fracture was produced at the femoral mid-diaphysis and stabilized with a 1-mm-diameter intramedullary Kirschner wire. X-rays confirmed the fracture alignment and fixation. Three days later, the VT groups underwent vibration therapy (1 mm, 60 Hz for 20 minutes, three times per week for 14 or 28 days). The bone and callus quality were assessed by densitometry, three-dimensional microstructure, and mechanical test. RESULTS : Ovariectomized rats exhibited a substantial loss of bone mass and severe impairment in bone microarchitecture, both in the non-fractured femur and the bone callus. Whole-body vibration therapy exerted an important role in ameliorating the bone and fracture callus parameters in the osteoporotic bone. CONCLUSION: Vibration therapy improved bone quality and the quality of the fracture bone callus in ovariectomized rats.


Subject(s)
Animals , Female , Bony Callus/physiology , Femoral Fractures/therapy , Fracture Healing/physiology , Osteoporosis/physiopathology , Ovariectomy/adverse effects , Vibration/therapeutic use , Absorptiometry, Photon , Bone Density/physiology , Femoral Fractures/etiology , Femoral Fractures/physiopathology , Osteoporotic Fractures/etiology , Osteoporotic Fractures/physiopathology , Osteoporotic Fractures/therapy , Random Allocation , Rats, Wistar , Reproducibility of Results , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
7.
Arq. bras. neurocir ; 33(3): 258-265, set. 2014. ilus
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-756183

ABSTRACT

As fraturas vertebrais são comuns em idosos e em mulheres no período pós-menopausa. Tais fraturas podem ter como etiologia principal a osteoporose ou ser decorrentes de trauma, infecções ou neoplasia.A osteoporose é caracterizada por diminuição da massa e modificação da microarquitetura óssea, sendo a manifestação mais comum a fratura patológica. Apresenta como manifestação clínica dor, diminuição da altura e desalinhamento da coluna vertebral, sintomas neurológicos, bem como alteração na autoestima e problemas sociais. O diagnóstico de osteoporose é dado por meio da realização de densitometria óssea, sendo esse o padrão-ouro, podendo-se lançar mão de outros métodos de imagemem situações específicas. O tratamento da osteoporose inclui métodos para a prevenção de fraturas, tais como reposição de cálcio e vitamina D, uso de bifosfonados, paratormônio e reposição hormonal. Quando em vigência de fratura, a conduta preferida ainda é a abordagem não cirúrgica, sendo feitapor meio de imobilização, uso de analgésicos, fisioterapia e reabilitação motora. Quando em vigência de déficit neurológico, deformidade severa ou ausência de resposta ao tratamento conservador, está indicada a abordagem cirúrgica.


Vertebral fractures are common in the elderly and in women in the post menopausal period. Such fractures can have as cause osteoporosis or be due to trauma, infection or neoplasia. Osteoporosis is characterized by decreased bone mass and modified microarchitecture, the most common manifestation of a pathological fracture. Presenting clinical manifestation as pain, height loss and misalignment of the spine, neurological symptoms, and change in self-esteem and social problems. The diagnosis of osteoporosis is given by bone densitometry, this being the gold standard, and we can make use of other imaging methods in specific situations. Treatment of osteoporosis includes methods for the prevention of fractures, such as treatment with calcium and vitamin D, use of bisphosphonates, parathyroid hormone and hormone replacement. When in the presence of fracture, the preferred approach is still nonsurgical approach being taken by immobilization, analgesics, physical therapy and motor rehabilitation. Whenin the presence of neurologic deficit, severe deformity or lack of response to conservative treatment require surgical approach.


Subject(s)
Osteoporotic Fractures/complications , Osteoporotic Fractures/diagnosis , Osteoporotic Fractures/etiology , Osteoporotic Fractures/therapy , Osteoporotic Fractures/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL